Problem solved in full
-
Deriving the synodic month of 29.5306 d from the sidereal month 6 steps
Seven of the table's ten rows put a formula in the formula column. The Synodic month row puts a number: S = 29.5306 d, asserted. Derive it instead β from the Sidereal month row directly below it, plus one given the tool never mentions.
-
A month is a race between two angular speeds, so start by converting one. The sidereal month is the Moon's full lap against the fixed stars, and that is a clean 360Β° in the printed 27.3217 d.
-
Phase, though, is not measured against the stars β it is measured against the Sun, and the Sun's direction is not fixed, because Earth is orbiting it. The Sun therefore drifts one full turn against those same stars per sidereal year, 365.2564 d. This is the one number that does not come from the page; you have to bring it.
-
Now run one sidereal month and see what is missing. The Moon is back beside its starting star, but the Sun has slid on by ΞΈ0, and the Moon needs a further t1 to close that gap and be lit the same way again.
-
The Sun does not wait during the catch-up. In those 2.0437 d it moves again, by the fraction r of the gap it had already opened, and again during the fix for that β a geometric series, which is why the true delay is t1 divided by 1 β r rather than t1. Because r is only 0.075, the whole infinite chase costs just 8% more than the first estimate.
-
Add the catch-up to the sidereal month β or skip the series entirely, since phase advances at the difference of the two rates and 360Β° over that difference gives the same answer. Both routes land on 29.5306 d, which is precisely what the Synodic month row asserts, and 29.531 d is what its value column prints.
-
Then check the arithmetic a second way, using nothing from outside the table at all: subtract the two printed values.
Answer
S = 29.5306 d, and it is not a fact about the Moon β it is 27.3217 d of orbit plus 2.2089 d of chasing a Sun that moved. The gap between the table's two "month" rows is that chase, which is why they differ by 2.209 d and not by something arbitrary. Push the result somewhere the tool cannot go: twelve synodic months are 12 Γ 29.5306 = 354.367 d, which falls 10.875 d short of the 365.2422 d tropical year β the year the seasons actually follow, slightly shorter than the sidereal year of step 2 because the equinox itself creeps backwards. So a purely lunar calendar's months walk backwards through the seasons and return to the same season only after 365.2422 / 10.875 = 33.6 lunar years — which is 32.6 solar ones, and the near-miss between those two counts is exactly the drift being measured. Either way it is how Ramadan crosses summer and winter within one lifetime. But go to 235 months instead of 12 and the mismatch almost disappears: 235 Γ 29.5306 = 6939.69 d against 19 tropical years of 6939.60 d, agreeing to 0.09 d β about two hours. Moon phase on a given calendar date therefore repeats every 19 years, which is the Metonic cycle, and the reason Easter can be computed centuries in advance rather than watched for.
-
References (3)
- The phase and illuminated-fraction algorithms the tool implements: Jean Meeus, Astronomical Algorithms, 2nd edition, ch. 48β49. Willmann-Bell, 1998. ISBN 978-0-943396-61-3.
- The synodic month the 29.53-day constant comes from: J. Chapront, M. Chapront-TouzΓ© and G. Francou, "A new determination of lunar orbital parameters, precession constant and tidal acceleration from LLR measurements." Astronomy & Astrophysics 387(2), 700β709, 2002.
- The Moon's synchronous rotation, behind the tidal-locking block: B. A. Archinal et al., "Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009." Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 109(2), 101β135, 2010.