Problem solved in full
-
The period of a 1 m pendulum released from rest at 30° 11 steps
A 1 m pendulum is released from rest at 30°. Find its period exactly — the textbook formula is not the answer — and then find how close to vertical you would have to release it to stretch one full swing to 10 s. Take g = 9.81 m/s², no damping.
-
Two quantities fix the natural frequency, and the mass is not one of them: it multiplies every term of the equation of motion and cancels before anything else happens.
-
Replace sin θ by θ and what remains is a harmonic oscillator, whose period is 2π/ω0. Read what dropped out: θ0. Amplitude-independence is a property of that replacement, not of the pendulum.
-
Now do it without the replacement. Energy conservation needs no small angle — the kinetic energy at angle θ is exactly the potential energy given up in falling from θ0 — so solve it for the angular velocity instead.
-
Time is distance over speed, integrated, and a quarter period is the swing from 0 out to θ0. The release angle is back, sitting in the integrand and in the upper limit at once, so the period cannot be independent of it.
-
The integrand blows up at θ = θ0, and the identity cos θ = 1 − 2sin²(θ/2) shows the blow-up is only a square root of a simple zero: the difference of cosines is a difference of squares. Write k for the sine of half the amplitude, and let φ sweep 0 to π/2 while θ sweeps out to θ0.
-
The awkward root now cancels against dθ, and what is left is the complete elliptic integral of the first kind — the formula the panel above displays, which writes its argument as sin²(θ0/2), that is k², not k.
-
K has no elementary closed form, but its integrand does: a binomial series in u = k²sin²φ, whose coefficients are the central binomial ones.
-
Integrate that series term by term and Wallis' integral hands back the very same cn the binomial expansion just produced. That coincidence is the whole trick.
-
Each term therefore picks cn up twice, so every coefficient of the period series is a binomial coefficient squared: 1/4, 9/64 and 25/256 are the squares of 1/2, 3/8 and 5/16.
-
At 30° the half-amplitude is 15°, so k² is only 0.067 and each term is more than 20 times smaller than the one before it. Stop at 3 terms and you get 1.017378, which multiplies out to 2.0409 s; the 4th term is what moves the final digit.
-
Multiply. This is the exact period the panel prints, and 1.0174 is the ratio printed beside it — both of them reached without evaluating K numerically once.
Answer
2.0410 s, where the small-angle formula promised 2.0061 s. The series that got you there has a short reach: its terms carry k2n with k = sin(θ0/2), so as the release angle approaches vertical they stop shrinking and the integral has to be faced on its own terms. There K(k) grows like ln(4/cos(θ0/2)) — the period does diverge at 180°, but only logarithmically, and a logarithm is a cruel thing to have to invert. A 10 s period, about 5 times the small-angle value, demands a release within 0.182° of vertical. Doubling it to 20 s squares the demand: 7.2×10⁻⁵ degrees, roughly 2500 times tighter. The pendulum does not buy that time by drifting slowly around the whole orbit — it spends almost all of it inside that last fraction of a degree.
-
References (2)
- The exact period as an elliptic integral, and the separatrix: L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Mechanics, 3rd ed., §11 and §12. Butterworth-Heinemann, 1976. ISBN 978-0-7506-2896-9.
- How badly the small-angle formula fails at large amplitude: A. Big-Alabo, "Approximate period for large-amplitude oscillations of a simple pendulum based on quintication of the restoring force." European Journal of Physics 41, 015001, 2019.