Run every date from 1900 to 2025 through this tool and the twelve possible results come out nowhere near equal. Six of them — 1, 3, 5, 7, 8 and 9 — land on exactly 11.11%, one ninth each. Three others are visibly starved: 2 appears 3.09% of the time, 4 appears 7.29%, 6 appears 6.93%. That missing share is not lost, it is withheld, because 11 reduces to 2, 22 to 4 and 33 to 6. Add each master number back to the digit it would have become and you recover 11.11% exactly, three times over. A master number is not rare because it is special; it is rare because the rule that creates it takes its share from one particular digit.