Lesson
The theory — Death Star Energy Calculator
Blowing a planet apart means overcoming its own gravity, and the size of that job has a name: the gravitational binding energy. It is the energy you would have to supply to disassemble the body and carry every piece infinitely far away — for a uniform sphere, U = 3GM² / (5R).
What each symbol means
M- the planet’s mass. The default
5.972 × 10²⁴kg is Earth’s, and it enters squared — every piece attracts every other, so the bill grows faster than the mass. R- the radius,
6.371 × 10⁶m. It divides, so a denser planet of the same mass is harder to break. efficiency- the share of supplied energy that does useful work,
35%here. The requirement is the binding energy divided by this. pulse- the pulse duration in seconds. Energy divided by time is power, which is where the absurd figure comes from.
Where the formula comes from
- For a uniform sphere the binding energy is
U = 3GM² / (5R). With Earth’s mass and radius that is about2.24 × 10³²J. - Only 35% of what the weapon delivers does the work, so the energy it must supply is
2.24 × 10³² / 0.35 ≈ 6.40 × 10³²J — the figure reported above. - Divide by the pulse length to get power:
6.40 × 10³² / 6 ≈ 1.07 × 10³²W. For scale the page converts that to Sun-output: the Sun radiates3.828 × 10²⁶W, so this is19.4days of the entire Sun, released in six seconds.
How to read what you see
Three figures — required energy, required power, and the same energy expressed as days of total solar output. The third exists because the first two are past the point where scientific notation means anything to a human; 19.4 days of the Sun is a number you can actually feel.
- Assumes
- A uniform sphere, which Earth is not — it has a dense iron core, so its true binding energy is somewhat higher than the uniform formula gives. It also assumes the only job is undoing gravity, ignoring the energy needed to vaporise rock and the fact that most of it would radiate away rather than pushing anything apart.
- Breaks when
- The result is a lower bound, and it is already impossible. Nothing here explains where such a weapon stores 19 days of the Sun, or how it survives holding it — a beam carrying
10³²W would destroy its own emitter long before its target. The calculation is honest about the physics and silent about the engineering, which is the usual pattern when a film’s numbers are taken seriously: the energy is not the problem, the containment is.
Problem solved in full
-
Energy required to disperse Earth so no piece falls back 5 steps
How much energy does it actually take to blow up a planet? Not to crack it — to disperse it, so no piece falls back. Work it out for Earth, then see what kind of power source that implies.
-
The target is the gravitational binding energy: the work needed to carry every shell of the planet out to infinity against the gravity of everything already inside it. Integrating shell by shell for a uniform sphere gives the 3/5, and real planets are denser at the centre, so this is an underestimate.
-
Putting Earth's mass and radius in gives 2.24 × 10³² joules. Nothing about that number is exotic — it follows from G, a mass and a radius.
-
No weapon converts stored energy to output perfectly. At 35% efficiency the machine must supply 6.40 × 10³².
-
Delivered in a six-second shot, that is a power of 1.07 × 10³² watts.
-
The Sun radiates 3.83 × 10²⁶ watts in every direction. So the beam runs at roughly 280 000 times the Sun's entire output, and the shot spends what the Sun emits in 19.4 days.
Answer
The tool prints 6.40 × 10³² J, 1.07 × 10³² W and 19.4 days of total solar output. The physics is real even if the station is not, and the interesting part is which number is the problem. The energy is merely enormous; the power is the impossible bit, because it has to be delivered in seconds. Since binding energy goes as M²/R, a body twice Earth's mass and radius costs twice as much, not eight times — and Jupiter, at 318 masses but only 11 radii, costs about 9200 times as much. Switch the target and watch the exponent move.
-
References (1)
- Earth's mass and radius and the Sun's luminosity, all three taken as IAU nominal values: A. Prša et al., "Nominal Values for Selected Solar and Planetary Quantities: IAU 2015 Resolution B3." The Astronomical Journal 152(2), 41, 2016.