Problems solved in full
-
An orbit with e = 0.4 around a solar-mass star 5 steps
An orbit has a = 1 AU and e = 0.4 around a solar-mass star. Find the speed at both ends, and then find the quantity that stays the same all the way round.
-
An ellipse with semi-major axis a and eccentricity e reaches closest at a(1βe) and furthest at a(1+e). Those two radii are all the geometry the problem needs.
-
Vis-viva gives the speed at any radius from the radius and the semi-major axis alone. Nothing about mass of the orbiting body enters, and nothing about where it started.
-
Evaluate at both ends. The visualiser above prints exactly these two numbers for this orbit, and it does so by running this same equation rather than by simulating anything.
-
Now take the ratio and watch the starβs mass cancel. The speed ratio depends on eccentricity and on nothing else β not on a, not on the star. A comet with e = 0.99 arrives 199 times faster than it leaves the far end.
-
That ratio is a conservation law in disguise. Multiply each speed by its radius and the two products are equal: angular momentum per unit mass is constant, so what the orbit gains in distance it must give up in speed.
Answer
45.5 km/s at perihelion, 19.5 km/s at aphelion, a ratio of exactly 2.333 = (1+e)/(1βe). Both radius-times-speed products come to 27.3, which is Keplerβs second law written as a number: the βequal areas in equal timesβ rule is just rv = constant. That is why comets spend almost all their time in the outer part of an orbit and cross the inner system in weeks β a fact about area, not about gravity switching strength.
-
-
Fraction of the year a planet spends crawling through the far half 6 steps
The panel gives the orbit a period of 1.000 yr and puts perihelion at 0.6000 AU against 1.400 at aphelion. It animates the planet crawling through the far half and never says how long it spends there. Work that out β as a fraction of the year, from the eccentricity alone.
-
Start from what is printed. The two apses sit at a(1βe) and a(1+e), so this orbit reaches more than twice as far out as it comes in.
-
Kepler's second law is the whole tool here, and it is a statement about area, not distance: the line from the Sun sweeps equal areas in equal times. So time spent is area swept, and nothing else.
-
Cut the ellipse in half along the minor axis. Each half has the same area β but the Sun is not at the centre, it sits at a focus, offset by c = ae. Seen from there, the far half is the half-ellipse plus the triangle between the focus and that cut.
-
Divide by the whole area and almost everything cancels. Both a and b disappear, and what survives is a startlingly clean result: the fraction is one half plus the eccentricity over Ο.
-
Put this orbit's eccentricity in. Nearly 63% of the year is spent in the outer half β the planet is not merely slower out there, it is out there for two-thirds of its life.
-
Now put Earth's in, which is only 0.0167.
Answer
The far half takes Β½ + e/Ο of the period: 62.73% for the orbit on screen, and 50.53% for Earth. That last figure is small but not nothing β it is 3.88 days more of the year spent on the far side of the minor axis than the near one, and the same eccentricity, cut on a different line, is why the calendar's seasons are of unequal length: Earth passes perihelion in early January, so northern winter is the fast half of the orbit and runs about five days shorter than summer. Nothing in the derivation used the period, the mass, or the size of the orbit. Only the shape.
-
Learning path
Orbits from two numbers
References (2)
- Kepler working from Tycho Braheβs observations, and the laws themselves: J. Kepler, Astronomia Nova, 1609 β translated by W. H. Donahue as New Astronomy, Cambridge University Press, 1992. ISBN 978-0-521-30131-2.
- Equal areas as conservation of angular momentum: H. Goldstein, C. Poole and J. Safko, Classical Mechanics, 3rd ed., Β§3.2. Addison-Wesley, 2002. ISBN 978-0-201-65702-9.