Lesson
The theory — Crystal Packing: How Full Is a Metal?
A crystal repeats one unit cell. Counting its atoms takes sharing into account: a corner atom belongs to eight cells, a face atom to two. The packing fraction is the share of the cell inside the atoms, with each atom a sphere just touching its nearest neighbours: φ = n · (4/3)πr³ / V, where the radius r is half the nearest-neighbour distance. The same cell gives the density, ρ = nM / (NAV), since it holds n atoms of known mass.
What each symbol means
a- the lattice parameter: the edge of the cubic cell, or the edge of the hexagonal base, measured by X-ray or neutron diffraction
n- atoms per cell, counting a corner atom as ⅛ and a face atom as ½
r- the radius of the touching spheres, half the shortest distance between two atom centres
φ- the packing fraction, the part of the cell's volume inside the spheres
- Assumes
- Atoms are hard spheres of one radius, touching along the shortest distance in the lattice. Lattice parameters are room-temperature values from Wyckoff's 1963 compilation, except iron at 912 °C and polonium at 283 K. The crystal is perfect: no missing atoms, no impurities, one isotope mixture, the standard atomic weight. Every density the page prints is the X-ray density of such a crystal; pores and vacancies in a real sample can only lower it.
- Breaks when
- Wherever the atom is not a hard sphere, which the page itself shows twice: iron's radius changes by 2.52% with its neighbours, and zinc's c/a says its bonds between layers differ from those within a layer. For compounds, whose two kinds of ion have two radii and pack by a different rule. And at the level of parts per billion, where vacancies, impurities and the isotope mix all have to be measured, as the Avogadro project did.
Problem solved in full
-
Counting Avogadro's number with a silicon sphere 4 steps
In 2017 the International Avogadro Coordination reported a 1 kg sphere of silicon enriched to 99.9985% silicon-28. Its molar mass was 27.976942674 g/mol, its lattice parameter 543.0996218 pm and its density 2320.068748 kg/m³. Silicon has the diamond structure. How many atoms are there in a mole?
-
The diamond cell holds eight atoms: eight corners at ⅛, six faces at ½, and four inside.
-
Its volume is a³, with a = 5.430996218×10⁻⁸ cm: 1.6019114×10⁻²² cm³.
-
Its mass is density times volume, 2.320068748 g/cm³ × 1.6019114×10⁻²² cm³ = 3.7165447×10⁻²² g, so one atom weighs an eighth of that, 4.6456808×10⁻²³ g.
-
A mole of these atoms weighs 27.976942674 g. Dividing by the mass of one atom counts them.
Answer
NA = 6.022140516×10²³ per mole, the paper's own figure to all ten digits it gives for this sphere. The page runs the same arithmetic forwards: press Silicon and natural silicon's 5.4307 Å, eight atoms and 28.085 g/mol give 2.329 g/cm³. Since 2019 Avogadro's constant is fixed by definition at 6.02214076×10²³, so the measurement now runs the other way, from counted atoms to a mass, and it is one of the two most accurate methods by which the kilogram is realised.
-
References (3)
- Every room-temperature lattice parameter on the page, entry by entry, from Wyckoff's compilation as the Crystallography Open Database transcribes it: R. W. G. Wyckoff, Crystal Structures, vol. 1, 2nd edition. Interscience, New York, 1963; entries 9008460-9008565 of the Crystallography Open Database (crystallography.net). Polonium: W. H. Beamer and C. R. Maxwell, J. Chem. Phys. 17, 1293 (1949), COD 1509138.
- Iron's two lattice parameters at 912 °C, from neutron diffraction in the furnace: M. Onink, C. M. Brakman, F. D. Tichelaar, E. J. Mittemeijer, S. van der Zwaag, J. H. Root and N. B. Konyer, "The lattice parameters of austenite and ferrite in Fe-C alloys as functions of carbon concentration and temperature." Scripta Metallurgica et Materialia 29(8), 1993, pp. 1011-1016. DOI 10.1016/0956-716X(93)90169-S
- The silicon-28 sphere of the worked problem, and the Avogadro constant it gave: G. Bartl, P. Becker, B. Beckhoff et al. (33 authors), "A new ²⁸Si single crystal: counting the atoms for the new kilogram definition." Metrologia 54(5), 2017, pp. 693-715. DOI 10.1088/1681-7575/aa7820