Problem solved in full
-
Multiplying 3 + 2i by its conjugate to prove a product 5 steps
Multiply 3 + 2i by its conjugate, then turn the result into a proof that a product of two sums of two squares is again a sum of two squares. This is Multiply with z₁ = 3 + 2i and z₂ = 3 − 2i.
-
The two cross terms are equal and opposite, so they cancel. What is left is the −b²i², which changes sign and adds instead of subtracting — so a conjugate pair always multiplies to a real number, and that number is assembled by squaring.
-
That real number already has a name. The modulus is the distance from the origin, so |z|² is a² + b² by Pythagoras, and the panel's 3.606 is √13 rounded up in the third decimal.
-
Now the general product of two complex numbers, with i² = −1 sending one term across to join the real part. No moduli appear here yet.
-
Apply step 1 to that product. A second pair of cross terms, −2abcd and +2abcd, cancels in the expansion, and the four terms that survive factor into two brackets. Every letter is an integer if you want it to be, and nothing in the final line mentions i.
-
So a pair of integer pairs manufactures a third. 3 + 2i carries 13 and 1 + 2i carries 5; their product carries 65. Conjugating the second factor reflects it across the real axis and delivers a different pair with the same sum.
Answer
The panel prints the conjugate product as 13 and the modulus as 3.606, and 3.606² = 13.003 is the rounding rather than a disagreement. What is worth keeping is that the identity survives having the complex numbers erased: (a² + b²)(c² + d²) = (ac − bd)² + (ad + bc)² is a statement about four integers with no i left in it. Diophantus recorded this very number in the third century — 65 splits as 1 + 64 and as 16 + 49, he noted, because it is 13 × 5 and each factor is itself a sum of two squares — some thirteen centuries before Cardano first wrote down a square root of a negative number. Two prime factors, two representations: 13 alone has only 9 + 4, and 5 alone has only 1 + 4. Complex multiplication is the machine that manufactures the second representation, and the conjugate is the lever that switches between them.
-
Learning path
Beyond the quadratic
References (1)
- Insight block 3 — the cubic that made imaginary numbers unavoidable: G. Cardano, Artis Magnae, sive de Regulis Algebraicis. Nuremberg, 1545, chapter XXXVII. R. Bombelli, L'Algebra, Book I. Bologna, 1572 — where the "impossible" quantities are shown to cancel and leave the real roots.