Lesson
The theory — Quantum Tunnelling
Quantum tunnelling is a particle crossing a region where its energy E is less than the potential energy U, which classical mechanics forbids. Inside such a barrier the wavefunction does not oscillate. It is a mixture of e−κx and e+κx, and in a thick barrier the decaying part is nearly all of it, with κ = √(2m(U − E))/ħ, and whatever amplitude is left at the far side carries on as a travelling wave. The transmission coefficient T is the fraction of the incident probability current that gets through. For a rectangular barrier it is exact and closed-form, and once κa is above 2 it is within 4% of 16E(U − E)/U² · e−2κa.
What each symbol means
E- the particle's kinetic energy outside the barrier
U- the height of the barrier: the particle's potential energy inside it
a- the barrier's width
κ- the decay constant inside the barrier; in a thick barrier |ψ|² falls by a factor e over a distance 1/(2κ)
T- the transmission coefficient, the share of particles that get through; R = 1 − T are reflected
- Assumes
- One dimension, a barrier with vertical sides and a flat top, and the same potential on both sides of it. A particle of one definite energy, which is a plane wave rather than a packet, so T is a probability per particle. No relativity: the energies here are electronvolts, against the 511 keV of an electron's rest energy.
- Breaks when
- A real barrier has sloping sides. The vacuum gap of a microscope is lowered and rounded by the image charge an electron induces in each metal, and an applied voltage tilts its top; with a strong enough field the barrier becomes a triangle and electrons leave a cold metal by tunnelling through it, which is field emission and follows the Fowler–Nordheim law rather than this one. For a smooth barrier the WKB approximation replaces κa by the integral of κ(x) across it. And the thing an experiment sends is a packet with a spread of energies, whose transmission is averaged over that spread, which blurs the sharp resonances above the top.
Problem solved in full
-
How small a step can a tunnelling microscope see? 4 steps
A scanning tunnelling microscope's electronics hold the tunnelling current steady to 2%. The electron is 4.5 eV below the top of a 0.5 nm gap. What change in the gap does a 2% change in current correspond to? Press STM gap for the first step.
-
The page prints the decay constant inside the barrier, and the barrier is thick in units of 1/κ:
-
At that thickness T is e−2κa times a prefactor that does not depend on a, and the current follows T, so ln T falls in a straight line with a:
-
Closing the gap by Δa raises the current by 2%, which is a rise of ln 1.02 in ln T:
-
Solving the exact formula for the same factor of 1.02, instead of the estimate, gives the same answer to four figures:
Answer
A change of 0.9111 pm in the gap changes the current by 2%: a fifty-eighth of the Bohr radius, 52.92 pm, from electronics that do nothing cleverer than hold a current steady. The tip does not need to be sharp to that degree, only to end in one atom closer to the sample than its neighbours, because the current is decided almost entirely by that atom's distance from the surface. This is why a tunnelling microscope can follow a surface to a small fraction of an atom's height.
-
Learning path
Quantum mechanics: matter as waves
References (3)
- The rectangular barrier solved exactly, with the reflection and transmission probabilities for E below the top in closed form, the same formula this page evaluates: R. Fitzpatrick, "Square Potential Barrier", in Quantum Mechanics (lecture notes), Department of Physics, University of Texas at Austin, 2010.
- The first scanning tunnelling microscope, which turned the exponential dependence of the tunnelling current on the gap into a picture of a surface: G. Binnig, H. Rohrer, Ch. Gerber and E. Weibel, "Surface Studies by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy", Physical Review Letters 49, 57–61 (1982).
- The constants: the Planck constant and the elementary charge, exact in the SI, and the electron, muon and proton masses: E. Tiesinga, P. J. Mohr, D. B. Newell and B. N. Taylor, "CODATA recommended values of the fundamental physical constants: 2018", Reviews of Modern Physics 93, 025010 (2021); values as printed on NIST's CODATA 2018 wall chart.