Quantum Tunnelling

Choose a particle, its energy E, and the height U and width a of the barrier in its way. The page solves the Schrödinger equation exactly in front of the barrier, inside it and behind it, draws the wave, and prints the share that gets through beside the thick-barrier estimate, 16E(U − E)/U² · e−2κa.

Loading interactive simulation...

Lesson

The theory — Quantum Tunnelling

Quantum tunnelling is a particle crossing a region where its energy E is less than the potential energy U, which classical mechanics forbids. Inside such a barrier the wavefunction does not oscillate. It is a mixture of e−κx and e+κx, and in a thick barrier the decaying part is nearly all of it, with κ = √(2m(U − E))/ħ, and whatever amplitude is left at the far side carries on as a travelling wave. The transmission coefficient T is the fraction of the incident probability current that gets through. For a rectangular barrier it is exact and closed-form, and once κa is above 2 it is within 4% of 16E(U − E)/U² · e−2κa.

What each symbol means

E
the particle's kinetic energy outside the barrier
U
the height of the barrier: the particle's potential energy inside it
a
the barrier's width
κ
the decay constant inside the barrier; in a thick barrier |ψ|² falls by a factor e over a distance 1/(2κ)
T
the transmission coefficient, the share of particles that get through; R = 1 − T are reflected
Assumes
One dimension, a barrier with vertical sides and a flat top, and the same potential on both sides of it. A particle of one definite energy, which is a plane wave rather than a packet, so T is a probability per particle. No relativity: the energies here are electronvolts, against the 511 keV of an electron's rest energy.
Breaks when
A real barrier has sloping sides. The vacuum gap of a microscope is lowered and rounded by the image charge an electron induces in each metal, and an applied voltage tilts its top; with a strong enough field the barrier becomes a triangle and electrons leave a cold metal by tunnelling through it, which is field emission and follows the Fowler–Nordheim law rather than this one. For a smooth barrier the WKB approximation replaces κa by the integral of κ(x) across it. And the thing an experiment sends is a packet with a spread of energies, whose transmission is averaged over that spread, which blurs the sharp resonances above the top.

Past 0.4 nm, each 0.1 nm of gap divides the current by 8.8 🖖

Press STM gap. The electron sits 4.5 eV below the top of the barrier, about the work function of a metal, and the gap is 0.5 nm. Widen it by 0.1 nm and T falls 8.789 times; the thick-barrier estimate, e2κ × 0.1 nm, says 8.790. The ladder below the results shows the same step at every width from 0.4 nm out, to within 0.3%. Only the first steps are smaller, 7.293 from 0.1 to 0.2 nm, because a barrier that thin is not yet thick in units of 1/κ. Gerd Binnig, Heinrich Rohrer and their colleagues at IBM's Zürich research laboratory built the scanning tunnelling microscope on this steepness and reported it in 1982. Hold the current constant while the tip scans and the tip's height has to trace the surface; and because an atom 0.2 nm further back, two steps down the ladder, carries about 77 times less current, nearly all of it flows through the single atom at the apex. The 8.8 does not depend on E either. Change E and U together, keeping U − E at 4.5 eV, and it stays at 8.79, because κ = √(2m(U − E))/ħ contains only the difference.

A proton gets through about 10⁶⁶ times less often than an electron 🖖

Press Electron, 0.5 eV and then Proton, 0.5 eV: the same energy, the same 1 eV barrier, the same 0.5 nm. The electron gets through 10.14% of the time. The proton, 1,836 times heavier, gets through with a probability of 1.535×10⁻⁶⁷. Mass enters κ under a square root, so the proton's κa is only √1,836 ≈ 42.85 times the electron's, 77.62 against 1.811. But κa sits in an exponent, and e−2κa turns a factor of 43 into 66 orders of magnitude. The muon, 206.8 electron masses, lands in between at 9.530×10⁻²³; the table under the ladder has all three. So tunnelling is not a property of small things in general. It belongs to light particles and thin walls: set the width to 0.05 nm and the proton's T climbs to 7.252×10⁻⁷.

Over the top, 46% still bounces back 🖖

Press 1.2 eV over 1 eV. The electron has 20% more energy than the barrier, so classically it would sail over every time. The page gives T = 53.64%. The reflection comes from the edges. At x = 0 the wavelength jumps, from 1.120 nm outside to a longer one inside, and any abrupt change in a wave's medium sends part of the wave back, as glass reflects a little of the light that enters it. The reflections from the front edge and the back edge interfere, and when the barrier holds a whole number of half-wavelengths, qa = nπ, they cancel exactly and T = 1. That happens at E − U = n²h²/(8ma²), which are the energy levels of a <a href="/phy/particle-in-a-box">particle in a box</a> as wide as the barrier. Press Box level: a 1 nm barrier, E − U = 0.376 eV, the ground level of an electron in a 1 nm box, and T = 100.00%. The energy plot marks these levels with dashed lines, and the curve touches 1 at each.

Problem solved in full

  1. How small a step can a tunnelling microscope see? 4 steps

    A scanning tunnelling microscope's electronics hold the tunnelling current steady to 2%. The electron is 4.5 eV below the top of a 0.5 nm gap. What change in the gap does a 2% change in current correspond to? Press STM gap for the first step.

    Open this problem in the tool

    1. The page prints the decay constant inside the barrier, and the barrier is thick in units of 1/κ:

    2. At that thickness T is e−2κa times a prefactor that does not depend on a, and the current follows T, so ln T falls in a straight line with a:

    3. Closing the gap by Δa raises the current by 2%, which is a rise of ln 1.02 in ln T:

    4. Solving the exact formula for the same factor of 1.02, instead of the estimate, gives the same answer to four figures:

    Answer

    A change of 0.9111 pm in the gap changes the current by 2%: a fifty-eighth of the Bohr radius, 52.92 pm, from electronics that do nothing cleverer than hold a current steady. The tip does not need to be sharp to that degree, only to end in one atom closer to the sample than its neighbours, because the current is decided almost entirely by that atom's distance from the surface. This is why a tunnelling microscope can follow a surface to a small fraction of an atom's height.

Learning path

Quantum mechanics: matter as waves

References (3)