Simple Pendulum / SHM

period, energy, and isochronism - animated

Loading interactive simulation...

why mass doesn't matter — Galileo was right 🖖

Drop a 10 kg bowling ball and a 1 g feather from the same height (no air resistance) — they land at the same instant. A pendulum works the same way: gravity pulls harder on a heavier bob, but the bob also has more inertia to overcome. The two effects cancel exactly, so mass drops out of the equation entirely. Only length and gravity remain. The two pendulums below share the same length but different gravity — Earth swings fast, the Moon swings slow.

isochronism — why swings keep time 🖖

Give a pendulum a tiny nudge or a big push and — for modest swings — each round trip takes almost exactly the same time. This amplitude-independence is called isochronism, and it's why a pendulum keeps steady time even as its swing slowly dies down. The period follows T = 2π√(L/g), so length rules through a square root: to make the tick twice as slow you need four times the length, not two.

a clock that weighed the Earth's shape 🖖

In 1672 the astronomer Jean Richer carried a precise pendulum clock from Paris to Cayenne, near the equator — and it lost about 2.5 minutes a day. The pendulum hadn't changed; gravity had. Earth spins, so it bulges at the equator where g is weaker, stretching every period slightly. Newton seized on this: a humble clock had measured the planet's shape, proving Earth is an oblate spheroid, not a perfect sphere.

THE PENDULUM — WHAT CHANGES THE PERIOD, AND WHAT DOES NOT?

Which Pendulum Case Are You In?

For small swings the period is T = 2π√(L/g), and the striking thing is what is missing from it: the mass, and how far you pulled it. Only the length and the local gravity matter, and both only as a square root. That independence is what made the pendulum the world's timekeeper for three centuries — and it is an approximation, which starts to fail once the swing gets wide.

The small-angle case — length and gravity, nothing else T = 2π√(L/g)
Change the gravity — the same pendulum runs slower T ∝ 1/√g
Change the length — four times as long is twice as slow T ∝ √L
A wide swing — the small-angle formula quietly under-reports T = T₀(1 + k²/4 + …)

01

The small-angle case — length and gravity, nothing else

What you know: A swing of a few degrees, where sin θ ≈ θ holds. The period is T = 2π√(L/g) and neither the mass nor the amplitude appears in it.

Period: T = 2π√(L/g)

Worked example: L = 1 m on Earth with a 10° swing → T = 2π√(1/9.81) = 2.006 s

Open this case: 1m, Earth
The small-angle case — length and gravity, nothing else. A one-metre pendulum on Earth takes almost exactly two seconds per swing. A swing of a few degrees, where sin θ ≈ θ holds. The period is T = 2π√(L/g) and neither the mass nor the amplitude appears in it.
A one-metre pendulum on Earth takes almost exactly two seconds per swing.

02

Change the gravity — the same pendulum runs slower

What you know: The same length somewhere else. T goes as 1/√g, so weaker gravity means a longer period and a clock that loses time.

Period: T ∝ 1/√g

Worked example: The same 1 m pendulum on the Moon, g = 1.62 m/s² → T = 4.937 s, about 2.46 times the Earth value

Open this case: 1m, Moon
Change the gravity — the same pendulum runs slower. Weaker gravity, longer period: the same length takes almost two and a half times as long. The same length somewhere else. T goes as 1/√g, so weaker gravity means a longer period and a clock that loses time.
Weaker gravity, longer period: the same length takes almost two and a half times as long.

03

Change the length — four times as long is twice as slow

What you know: The square root again, this time on L. Quadrupling the length doubles the period; to double the period you must quadruple the length.

Period: T ∝ √L

Worked example: L = 4 m on Earth → T = 2π√(4/9.81) = 4.012 s, exactly twice the one-metre value

Open this case: 4m, Earth
Change the length — four times as long is twice as slow. Four times the length gives twice the period — the square root at work. The square root again, this time on L. Quadrupling the length doubles the period; to double the period you must quadruple the length.
Four times the length gives twice the period — the square root at work.

04

A wide swing — the small-angle formula quietly under-reports

What you know: Past roughly 15° the approximation sin θ ≈ θ stops being good, and the true period grows with amplitude. The simple formula is then a lower bound, not an answer.

Period: T = T₀(1 + k²/4 + …)

Worked example: L = 1 m released from 75° → the exact period is 2.241 s against the 2.006 s the small-angle formula gives: 11.7% slow

Open this case: large angle
A wide swing — the small-angle formula quietly under-reports. At 75° the true swing takes noticeably longer than the small-angle formula predicts. Past roughly 15° the approximation sin θ ≈ θ stops being good, and the true period grows with amplitude. The simple formula is then a lower bound, not an answer.
At 75° the true swing takes noticeably longer than the small-angle formula predicts.
References (1)
  • Insight block 3 — the clock that lost time at the equator: J. Richer, Observations astronomiques et physiques faites en l'isle de Caïenne. Paris, 1679. Newton takes up the result in Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica, Book III, as evidence that the Earth is oblate.

Problem solved in full

  1. The period of a 1 m pendulum released at 20° 5 steps

    Find the period of a 1 m pendulum released at 20°, and find out how wrong the textbook formula is — because the textbook formula is not the answer. Take g = 9.81 m/s².

    1. The restoring torque goes as sin θ, which does not give simple harmonic motion. The famous formula only appears after replacing sin θ with θ — an approximation, not a derivation, and everything that follows inherits it.

    2. With that swap the equation is the harmonic oscillator and the period drops out. Note what it does not contain: the mass, and the amplitude. Both absences are consequences of the approximation, not of the pendulum.

    3. The exact period is an elliptic integral, but its series expansion says how fast the approximation decays. The correction is quadratic in the release angle, in radians.

    4. Evaluate it. This is the value the simulator above prints, because it uses the corrected period rather than the textbook one.

    5. Maximum speed comes from energy alone — drop height ℓ(1−cos θ₀) converted to kinetic energy — and needs no approximation at all.

    Answer

    2.021 s, against the textbook 2.006 s. The 0.76% gap is small but it is not noise: a clock built on the small-angle formula and swung at 20° loses about 11 minutes a day. That is why pendulum clocks use small amplitudes and why Huygens went to the trouble of a cycloidal suspension in 1656 — he had discovered that circular pendulums are not isochronous. The amplitude-independence everyone remembers is a property of the approximation, not of the pendulum.

Learning path

Circles and waves are the same motion

Leads to fourier-series

Example problems

  • 1m, Earth - L=1m, Earth — T=2.006 s, classic grandfather-clock length
  • 1m, Moon - L=1m, Moon (g=1.62) — T=4.946 s, 2.5× slower than on Earth
  • 4m, Earth - L=4m, Earth — T=4.020 s; quadruple length doubles the period
  • large angle - θ₀=75°, L=1m — T≈2.17 s; exact period is ~8% longer than small-angle approx