Lesson
The theory — The Spot of Arago
Seen from a point a distance z behind a plane, the plane divides into Fresnel zones, rings with edges at rn = √(nλz), the light from each arriving half a wavelength behind the last. A disc or hole of radius a covers N = a²/λz of them. In Fresnel's theory the centre of an opaque disc's shadow is exactly as bright as the open beam for every N: this is the spot of Arago, also called Poisson's spot. The centre of a hole's light is 4 sin²(πN/2) times the open beam, black whenever N is even. A zone plate blocks every other zone and focuses light at f = r1²/λ.
What each symbol means
a- the radius of the disc or hole
z- the distance from it to the screen
λ- the wavelength
N- a²/λz, the number of Fresnel zones the disc or hole covers
r_n- the outer edge of the nth zone, √(nλz); on a zone plate, r1√n
- Breaks when
- Fresnel's theory assumes the light reaches the screen at small angles. The exact scalar theory puts the centre of the shadow at z²/(z² + a²) of the open beam: 0.999996 for Arago's screen at half a metre, but 0.8 at z = 2a and a half at z = a. Fresnel stated the same proviso: the theorem holds “tant qu'il n'en résulte pas une trop grande obliquité”.
Problem solved in full
-
A 2 cm disc, five metres from the wall 3 steps
A disc 2 cm across stands 5 m from a wall, lit by a 633 nm laser. How many zones does it cover, how wide is the spot, and how smooth must its edge be, with errors scattered like a bell curve, before the spot loses half its brightness? The radius field stops at 5 mm, short of this disc. Press Arago's 2 mm screen first: it prints the spot's first minimum, 0.1205 mm, for a disc ten times smaller at a tenth of the distance.
-
The zones it covers, N = a²/λz:
-
Deep in the shadow the spot's radius to its first minimum is 0.38274 λz/a, and λz/a is the same as for the 2 mm screen at half a metre:
-
The edge error that halves the spot solves exp(−(2πaσ/λz)²) = ½:
Answer
31.6 zones, a spot 0.1211 mm in radius, and an edge true to 42 µm r.m.s. The deep-shadow formula gives the 2 mm screen the same 0.1211 mm, because it depends on a and z only through λz/a; the page's full integral puts that screen's first minimum at 0.1205 mm, since 3.16 zones is not yet deep shadow. Behind the 2 cm disc, with ten times the zones, the full integral and the formula agree to four places. The tolerance on the edge is set by λz/a too, so it is no tighter, although the shadow round the spot is now far darker.
-
Learning path
Wave optics
References (3)
- Arago's report on the 1818 diffraction prize, read on 15 March 1819: “M. Poisson, avait déduit des intégrales rapportées par l'auteur le résultat singulier que le centre de l'ombre d'un écran circulaire opaque devait … être aussi éclairé que si l'écran n'existait pas … l'observation a parfaitement confirmé le calcul” (No. XIII, p. 236); and Fresnel's own note: the theorem holds whatever the screen's diameter and distance “tant qu'il n'en résulte pas une trop grande obliquité”, for every colour, so the point must be white in white light, and “M. Arago a vérifié [ce résultat] sur l'ombre d'un écran de 2 millimètres de diamètre” (No. XIV, Note I, p. 369): A. Fresnel, Œuvres complètes, tome I, ed. H. de Senarmont, É. Verdet and L. Fresnel. Imprimerie impériale, Paris, 1866. No. XIII (Arago's report, pp. 229–246) and No. XIV, Note I (pp. 365–369).
- Why a real spot falls short: in the wave picture the spot “has intensity equal to the undisturbed wave front”, but “it is necessary to include disc-edge roughness to account for the intensity variation in experimental Poisson spot measurements”; their 2009 deuterium experiment used a disc of radius 30 µm with an edge roughness of about 300 nm and gave a spot “about a factor of 100 less than the undisturbed wave front”: T. Reisinger, G. Bracco and B. Holst, “Particle–wave discrimination in Poisson spot experiments”, New Journal of Physics 13, 065016 (2011).
- The zone plate's history: “usually attributed to Soret, though Lord Rayleigh constructed one four years previously, as shown by an entry in his notebook”, with the entry of 11 April 1871 quoted (“The experiment of blocking out the odd Huygens zones so as to increase the light at centre succeeded very well”): R. W. Wood, Physical Optics, 3rd edition. Macmillan, New York, 1934. pp. 37–38.